SAP C-DBADM-2601 Exam Overview:
| Certification Vendor: | SAP |
| Exam Name: | SAP Certified - Database Administrator - SAP HANA (C_DBADM_2601) |
| Exam Number: | C_DBADM_2601 |
| Exam Duration: | 180 minutes |
| Real Exam Qty: | 80 |
| Passing Score: | 65% |
| Available Languages: | English |
| Exam Format: | Multiple choice, Multiple response, Scenario-based questions |
| Related Certifications: | SAP Certified Technology Associate - SAP HANA Administration SAP Certified Technology Associate - SAP HANA 2.0 |
| Recommended Training: | SAP HANA Administration Training |
| Exam Registration: | SAP Certification Registration |
| Sample Questions: | SAP C-DBADM-2601 Sample Questions |
| Exam Way: | Online proctored or test center exam |
| Pre Condition: | Recommended experience with SAP HANA administration and basic database concepts |
| Official Syllabus URL: | https://training.sap.com/certification/ |
SAP C-DBADM-2601 Exam Syllabus Topics:
| Section | Objectives |
|---|---|
| Topic 1: Security and Authorization | - Authentication and authorization concepts - Security roles and privileges |
| Topic 2: Monitoring and Performance Tuning | - Performance analysis and troubleshooting - Resource management - System monitoring tools (HANA Cockpit) |
| Topic 3: SAP HANA Architecture and Core Concepts | - Tenant and system database concepts - SAP HANA system architecture overview - In-memory database concepts |
| Topic 4: Installation and Configuration | - Initial configuration and setup - SAP HANA installation procedures |
| Topic 5: Database Administration | - Backup and recovery operations - User and role management - Schema and object administration |
SAP Certified - Database Administrator - SAP HANA Sample Questions:
1. A regional home improvement retailer uses SAP HANA for replenishment analytics in an on-premises administration environment. After a scheduled start, SAP HANA cockpit shows the database as available. During post-start validation, the administrator sees that a configuration parameter change is visible in the approved change record, but the active administration check still reports the old parameter value. Reports continue to run, and the service owner wants to close the maintenance window.
The constraint is that the administrator must verify the active configuration state before closure. The team must not accept the change record as sufficient evidence when the system artifact still shows the previous value.
What should the administrator do next?
A) Update the change record with an additional note confirming that reports continue to run after startup.
B) Apply or activate the approved parameter change in the active administration context, then validate that the runtime check shows the approved value.
C) Restart the database again so the approved change record is automatically synchronized with the runtime check.
D) Close the maintenance window because database availability and running reports prove that the change did not disrupt operations.
2. A regional environmental testing company operates SAP HANA on-premises for laboratory turnaround analytics and is preparing a separate SAP HANA Cloud environment for migration rehearsal. During an administration review, the landscape worksheet shows one shared "administration owner" for both environments, but the operational evidence comes from different tools. SAP HANA cockpit confirms the on-premises system status, while SAP HANA Cloud Central confirms the cloud database status. The worksheet does not show which owner must act on each environment-specific alert or readiness item.
The constraint is that the administrator must make the landscape worksheet actionable without changing the assigned team structure. The handover must distinguish current operations from cloud migration readiness.
Which action best resolves the landscape ownership issue?
A) Keep the shared owner entry because both systems are SAP HANA databases and the same team supports them.
B) Treat the on-premises SAP HANA cockpit status as the controlling readiness signal for both environments.
C) Remove the SAP HANA Cloud readiness items until the migration rehearsal becomes the active operational workload.
D) Split the worksheet by environment, evidence source, and operational responsibility while retaining the same administration team.
3. CHALLENGE 4 - Receipt-to-Invoice Continuity During Transition Weekend
The finance team proposes a quicker overlap approach: allow local exception handling during the transition weekend so invoices can be settled faster, even if the route differs slightly by plant. The transition office wants a result that remains supportable after go-live. Which action is best aligned with the scenario?
A) Suspend invoice validation during the weekend and rely on post-go-live cleanup for any unsettled cases
B) Accept local exception handling because transition weekends should prioritize speed over continuity
C) Validate only goods receipt
D) Retain the stricter receipt-to-invoice sequence and validate whether finance traceability remains intact under overlap-period conditions
4. CHALLENGE 1 - First Close Configuration Traceability
The close coordinator wants to compare runtime between the newly installed validation database and the upgraded claims reporting system. The installed database record is complete, but the upgraded system record is missing a configuration value used during rehearsal. Which action best supports a defensible comparison?
A) Compare the runtimes as-is because both databases returned report outputs.
B) Exclude the installed database because only the upgraded system supports close reporting.
C) Replace the upgraded system record with the installed database record for consistency.
D) Update the upgraded system's administration record before using the runtime comparison.
5. A regional marine equipment distributor operates SAP HANA on-premises for service-parts analytics and has provisioned an SAP HANA Cloud environment for a future migration rehearsal. During an administration handover, the landscape note states that "database administration monitoring is active," but the evidence table mixes on-premises cockpit status with SAP HANA Cloud readiness notes. The administrator cannot determine which monitoring evidence supports the current workload and which evidence supports the planned cloud transition.
The constraint is that the handover must support environment-specific administration decisions. The team must keep both environments in scope while avoiding a combined status that hides operational responsibility.
Which action best improves the handover evidence?
A) Remove the SAP HANA Cloud readiness notes until the migration rehearsal becomes production-bound.
B) Keep the combined monitoring statement because both environments belong to the SAP HANA administration scope.
C) Use only the on-premises cockpit status because it supports the current service-parts analytics workload.
D) Separate the handover evidence by environment, current workload role, and administration evidence source.
Solutions:
| Question # 1 Answer: B | Question # 2 Answer: D | Question # 3 Answer: D | Question # 4 Answer: D | Question # 5 Answer: D |

We're so confident of our products that we provide no hassle product exchange.


By Roxanne


