SAP C_THR81_2605 Exam Overview:
| Certification Vendor: | SAP |
| Exam Name: | SAP Certified - SAP SuccessFactors Employee Central Core and Position Management |
| Exam Number: | C_THR81_2605 |
| Exam Price: | USD 560 (varies by region) |
| Related Certifications: | SAP Certified Associate - SAP SuccessFactors Employee Central Core SAP Certified Associate - SAP SuccessFactors Employee Central |
| Real Exam Qty: | 80 |
| Exam Format: | Multiple Choice, Multiple Response |
| Available Languages: | English |
| Exam Duration: | 180 minutes |
| Certificate Validity Period: | Typically 1 year (SAP Stay Current requirement applies) |
| Passing Score: | Approximately 65% |
| Sample Questions: | SAP C_THR81_2605 Sample Questions |
| Exam Way: | Online proctored or authorized test center |
| Pre Condition: | No mandatory prerequisites, but recommended familiarity with SAP SuccessFactors Employee Central fundamentals. |
| Official Syllabus URL: | https://training.sap.com/certification |
SAP C_THR81_2605 Exam Syllabus Topics:
| Section | Objectives |
|---|---|
| Topic 1: Organizational Management | - Organizational structure setup
|
| Topic 2: Employee Data Management | - Data maintenance
|
| Topic 3: Reporting and Integration | - Reporting tools in SuccessFactors
|
| Topic 4: SAP SuccessFactors Employee Central Overview | - Employee Central configuration basics
|
| Topic 5: Position Management | - Integration with Employee Central
|
SAP Certified - SAP SuccessFactors Employee Central Core and Position Management (C_THR81_2605) Sample Questions:
1. In a public cloud SAP SuccessFactors Employee Central tenant, a consultant is validating a manager-driven temporary schedule adjustment process in the web-based UI before a regional pilot. The transaction opens, saves, and completes workflow correctly for all tested employees, but for one newly enabled employee category the expected post-save update to the employee’s work schedule class does not occur. The same action updates the schedule class correctly for established categories.
HR operations wants to keep a single standardized adjustment process across the tenant and does not want to correct the schedule class manually after each approved request. The issue began after the new category was introduced during the latest configuration cycle. The consultant must correct the behavior without creating category-specific process variants.
What should the consultant investigate first?
Response:
A) Ask HR operations to update the work schedule class manually for the new category until the pilot period is complete.
B) Reclassify affected employees temporarily into an older category so the existing adjustment behavior can be reused without further changes.
C) Give managers direct edit access to the work schedule class so they can complete the missing update during the same transaction.
D) Review the post-save derivation or transaction configuration for the new category, then correct the dependency controlling the work schedule class update.
2. <strong>CHALLENGE 1 — Store Reference Timing for Employee Import Results</strong> The team notices that imported store employees and warehouse shift leads use the same employee import process, yet only some warehouse records show incorrect district context after review. The project lead wants to avoid a broad re-import unless the cause is repeatable.
What should the consultant determine first?
Response:
A) Whether district managers can approve warehouse manager changes without reviewing employee context.
B) Whether HR operations can manually override the district association during final manager testing.
C) Whether all workflow notifications for warehouse employees use the same message template.
D) Whether affected records reference store or district values that were corrected after the initial import sequence.
3. A consultant is validating a manager-led organizational reassignment process in a public cloud SAP SuccessFactors Employee Central tenant before regional user training. In the web-based UI, managers can select company and legal entity, but for one newly activated operating structure the department list includes valid-looking departments from a neighboring structure. The process remains usable, but testers are choosing incorrect combinations because the filtered scope is broader than intended.
Other structures display the correct narrowed department set. The customer wants the issue fixed without broadening department visibility across unrelated structures and without creating a separate reassignment design for the new rollout group. Reporting integrity and approval routing depend on correct department selection.
What is the best next step?
Response:
A) Create duplicate department records for the new structure so the intended values appear separately from the neighboring structure.
B) Ask managers to continue using the current list and rely on training guidance to choose the correct department during reassignment.
C) Broaden department visibility for all nearby structures so the same larger list appears consistently during reassignment processing.
D) Review the organizational associations for company, legal entity, and department in the new structure, then correct the relationship controlling filtered department availability.
4. <strong>CHALLENGE 1 — Resort Reference Alignment for Banquet Records</strong> During template remediation, most employee records can be created successfully, but selected banquet coordinator records show a department association that does not match the expected resort context. Several conference service values were updated after the initial template build.
Which action best supports a controlled remediation decision?
Response:
A) Give resort operations managers access to all banquet records so they can manually review and correct department associations.
B) Rework all resort, department, employee, and position records because any post-build conference service update invalidates the template.
C) Continue seasonal validation because the employee records save successfully and the associations can be reviewed after simulations begin.
D) Compare affected records against active resort, department, and conference service values, then correct only records with confirmed dependency impact.
5. <strong>CHALLENGE 3 — Shared Services Access for Location-Based Boundaries</strong> HR shared-services analysts report that they cannot finish some assigned test cases unless they receive broader access. The compliance lead wants location-based access behavior to remain visible during validation.
Which configuration approach best handles this governance-versus-governance tension?
Response:
A) Restrict HR shared-services access further until department managers complete all location-specific validation.
B) Broaden all HR shared-services access for the rest of testing and rely on audit review to identify inappropriate activity.
C) Adjust roles and target populations to match assigned validation responsibilities, then retest with representative HR analysts.
D) Keep the current access unchanged and treat every blocked test case as proof that location restrictions are working.
Solutions:
| Question # 1 Answer: D | Question # 2 Answer: D | Question # 3 Answer: D | Question # 4 Answer: D | Question # 5 Answer: C |

We're so confident of our products that we provide no hassle product exchange.


By Ella


